Independent · Updated October 30, 2026 · Every claim traceable
Home › Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Every figure on this site is meant to be checkable. This page states exactly what that promise covers — and what it does not.

What we publish

Comparison-led guides for people making a spending or adoption decision about AI models, agents, infrastructure and automation. Each guide answers a specific question, names a recommendation for a stated job, and lists the sources behind every factual claim it makes.

Where the numbers come from

What we do not claim

We do not present results as our own benchmarking unless the article explicitly describes a test we ran, together with its method. Most comparisons here are built from published, dated third-party evidence and verified pricing, and are labelled that way. We do not publish a ranking we cannot source, and we do not pad an article to reach a word count.

Dates and freshness

Every article carries its publication date next to the byline. Model pricing, availability and hosting plans change without notice, so a figure is only as good as the date printed beside it. Where a guide has been materially corrected after publication, the correction is noted in the article itself.

Corrections

Corrections take priority over new work. If something here is wrong, email hello@pavitrams.com with the source and we will fix it and say that we did. We would rather publish a correction than leave a stale number standing.

Advertising and independence

Display advertising and clearly labelled affiliate links fund the site. Sponsorship never determines a verdict, no placement is sold as editorial, and every page carrying affiliate links discloses it. Details are in our affiliate disclosure.

Contact

Corrections, benchmark tips and review requests go to the contact page.